Quantcast
Channel: Nazi
Viewing all 262 articles
Browse latest View live

German politician gets 6 months of probation for sporting a Nazi tattoo

$
0
0

nazi tattoo

A German court found a politician guilty on Tuesday for sporting a tattoo bearing the tower and gates of Auschwitz Nazi concentration camp, according to German paper, Potsdamer Neueste Nachrichten.

Marcel Zech, 27, a member of the far-right National Democratic Party and a council member near Berlin, was given six months probation for the tattoo, which was discovered when he went to a public pool on November 21, 2015.

auschwitz

According to the Associated Press, prosecutors asked for an unsuspended 10-month sentence for Zech's violation of Germany's ban on the public display of Nazi symbols.

Buchenwald nazi camp

Auschwitz, the largest death camp established by the Nazi regime, held approximately 1.3 million people between 1940 and 1945.

It was here that Nazis murdered approximately 1.1 million people, according to estimates from the US Holocaust Memorial Musem

Zech's tattoo also had the words "Jedem das Seine" or "To each their own," which was a Nazi slogan written on the gates of Buchenwald, another death camp.

Join the conversation about this story »


'Mein Kampf' published in Germany for 1st time since WWII

$
0
0

Germany Hitler Mein kampf

An annotated edition of "Mein Kampf," the first version of Adolf Hitler's notorious manifesto to be published in Germany since the end of World War II, went on sale Friday — a volume that many hope will help demystify the book and debunk the Nazi leader's writing.

The Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History has worked for several years on the plain-covered volume, officially titled "Hitler, Mein Kampf: A Critical Edition."

The rights to the book have been held for 70 years by the state of Bavaria, which has refused to allow reprints, but the copyright runs out at the end of 2015. 

The new edition "sets out as far as possible Hitler's sources, which were deeply rooted in the German racist tradition of the late 19th century," said the Munich institute's director, Andreas Wirsching. "This edition exposes the false information spread by Hitler, his downright lies and his many half-truths, which aimed at a pure propaganda effect."

"At a time when the well-known formulae of far-right xenophobia are threatening to become ... socially acceptable again in Europe, it is necessary to research and critically present the appalling driving forces of National Socialism and its deadly racism," Wirsching said.

Hitler wrote "Mein Kampf"— "My Struggle"— after he was jailed following the failed 1923 coup attempt known as the Beer Hall Putsch. The rambling tome set out Hitler's ultranationalist, anti-Semitic and anti-communist ideology, which would culminate in the Holocaust and a war of conquest in eastern Europe.

Millions of copies were printed after the Nazis took power in 1933, and it was published after the war in several other countries.

Germany Hitler Mein kampfGerman authorities have made clear that they won't tolerate any new editions without commentary, though none is known to be in the works, with incitement laws likely to be used against any such publications.

They are, however, broadly supportive of the annotated edition.

"I think one shouldn't pretend the book doesn't exist," Education Minister Johanna Wanka told n-tv television. "Such taboos can sometimes be counterproductive. It's important that people who want to debunk this book have the appropriate material."

Ian Kershaw, a Briton who is a leading biographer of Hitler, joined Friday's book presentation and said it was "high time for a rigorously academic edition of 'Mein Kampf'" to be made available.

"For years, I have considered the lifting of the ban on publication long overdue," Kershaw said. "Censorship is almost always pointless in the long term in a free society, and only contributes to creating a negative myth, making a forbidden text more mysterious and awakening an inevitable fascination with the inaccessible."

Germany's main Jewish group, the Central Council of Jews, said it has no objections to the critical edition but strongly supports ongoing efforts to prevent any new "Mein Kampf" without annotations. Its president, Josef Schuster, said he hopes the critical edition will "contribute to debunking Hitler's inhuman ideology and counteracting anti-Semitism."

Jewish opinion has been divided, however. One of Schuster's predecessors, Charlotte Knobloch, has said she worries the new edition will simply awaken interest in the original, not the commentary.

The bulky new edition is priced at $64. But Wirsching cautioned that it's important to avoid reducing the Nazi regime to Hitler — "that would be falling back to the 1950s."

Join the conversation about this story »

Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler made an absurd amount of money off of ‘Mein Kampf'

$
0
0

Hitler's Mein Kampf

During Hitler's nine-month imprisonment for trying to overthrow the German government in 1923, he wrote the book that would become the basis of his fortune — "Mein Kampf," or "My Struggle."

Initially sales of Hitler's anti-Semitic diatribe didn't capture Germany's attention.

"They sold, so-so,"Dr. Pascal Trees, a research associate at the Institute for Contemporary History, said in the Smithsonian documentary "Hitler's Riches."

"To be perfectly frank, it's not a good read," Trees said.

The führer's notorious memoir was first published in 1924 and cost 12 deutsche marks, according to Trees.

To spur sales, the Nazis decided to produce a newer, more straightforward edition of the manifesto.

The Third Reich, however, was still searching for a way to get Hitler's book into every German home.

The opportunity to further monetize "Mein Kampf" became apparent when Hitler was elected chancellor in 1933.

"Of course there were a lot of marriages, there always are, and then they all had to be paid for by the state,"author of "Hitler's Fortune" Dr. Cris Whetton said in "Hitler's Riches."

"The state bought the books [Mein Kampf] to present to every married couple, and Hitler reaped the profits,"Whetton added.

At the time, Hitler earned a 10% royalty from every sale of the book that became the official state wedding present to newlyweds.

At the peak of "Mein Kampf" sales, Hitler earned $1 million a year in royalties alone, equivalent to $12 million today.

By 1939, Hitler's work had been translated into 11 languages with 5,200,000 copies sold around the world.

hitler signs a book

What's more, since Hitler was chancellor of Germany, he was exempt from the 400,000 deutsche marks (approximately $120,000 in today's dollars) he owed in taxes, according to "Hitler's Riches."

"The authorities presumably with a little bit of pressure said we think it's reasonable as chancellor Herr Hitler should not paid tax,"Whetton said.

Since the end of World War II, the Führer's manifesto has not been reprinted because the rights have been held for 70 years by the state of Bavaria, which has refused to allow reprints.

Now that the copyright has expired, the first copies of an annotated edition of Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' from Munich's Institute of Contemporary History went on sale for $64 on Friday, the Associated Press reported.

The 2,000-page edition will be accompanied with more than 3,500 academic notes.

SEE ALSO: Why Hitler was such a successful orator

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A new book claims that the pope tried to kill Hitler

The 25 most ruthless leaders of all time

$
0
0

attila

One man's hero is another man's tyrant, a popular aphorism goes.

But while we can argue the validity and virtue of certain political agendas, the callous methods by which some leaders attain their goals are less up to interpretation.

After all, no matter how a historian tries to spin it, ordering a tower to be constructed out of live men stacked and cemented together with bricks and mortar is pretty brutal.

Business Insider put together a list of the most ruthless leaders of all time featuring men and women who employed merciless tactics to achieve their political and military agendas.

Note: All people on the list ruled prior to 1980, and no living figures were included. People are arranged in chronological order.

Qin Shi Huang

Reign: 247-210 B.C.

Qin, also called Qin Shihuangdi, united China in 221 B.C. and ruled as the first emperor of the Qin dynasty. He was known to order the killing of scholars whose ideas he disagreed with and the burning of "critical" books.

During his reign, he ordered the construction of a great wall (roughly speaking, the prequel to the modern Great Wall of China), and an enormous mausoleum featuring more than 6,000 life-size terra-cotta soldier figures. Large numbers of conscripts working on the wall died, and those working on the mausoleum were killed to preserve the secrecy of the tomb.

"Every time he captured people from another country, he castrated them in order to mark them and made them into slaves," Hong Kong University's Xun Zhou told the BBC.

Source: British Museum, Britannica, History, BBC



Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (aka Caligula)

Reign: A.D. 37-41

Caligula was quite popular at first because he freed citizens who were unjustly imprisoned and got rid of a stiff sales tax. But then he became ill, and he was never quite the same again.

He eliminated political rivals (forcing their parents to watch the execution), and declared himself a living god. According to Roman historian Suetonius, Caligula had sex with his sisters and sold their services to other men, raped and killed people, and made his horse a priest.

He was eventually attacked by a group of guardsman and stabbed 30 times.

Source: Biography.com, BBC, "Atlas of History's Greatest Heroes and Villains" by Howard Watson.



Attila the Hun

Reign: A.D. 434-453

After killing his brother, Attila became the leader of the Hunnic Empire, centered in present-day Hungary, and ended up becoming one of the most feared assailants of the Roman Empire.

He expanded the Hunnic Empire to present-day Germany, Russia, Ukraine, and the Balkans. He also invaded Gaul with the intention of conquering it, though he was defeated at the Battle of Catalaunian Plains.

"There, where I have passed, the grass will never grow gain," he reportedly remarked on his reign.

Source: Britannica, Biography



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

A 93-year-old former Nazi guard at Auschwitz will go on trial in Germany soon

$
0
0

auschwitz

A 93-year-old former guard at the Nazi death camp Auschwitz will go on trial in Germany in April on charges of being an accessory to the murder of at least 1,075 people, a German court announced on Friday.

The accused was a member of the Nazi SS guard team at Auschwitz in occupied Poland from November 1942 to June 1943, a court spokesman in the western city of Hanau near Frankfurt said, adding that the man had been deemed fit for trial.

Although the former guard is not accused of having been directly involved in any killings, the prosecution's office holds that he was aware of the camp's function as a facility for mass murder.

By joining its organizational structure, he consciously participated and even accelerated the deaths of hundreds of people, the prosecutors say.

German court rulings have established a precedent for the conviction of Nazi concentration camp employees for being guilty of accessory to murder.

Oskar GroeningLast year, 94-year-old Oskar Groening, known as the "bookkeeper of Auschwitz", was sentenced to four years in prison after he was convicted of being an accessory to the murder of 300,000 people in Auschwitz.

Three other cases involving death camp employees are pending trial in German courts.

In the northern city of Kiel, 92-year-old Helma M. is accused of being an accessory to the murder of 260,000 people in Auschwitz.

In her case, the defense maintains that the accused is unfit for trial. A final court ruling on this is expected in the coming weeks, a court spokesman said on Friday.

In the western town of Detmold, 94-year-old Reinhold H. is accused of being an accessory to the murder of 170,000 people in Auschwitz and has been deemed fit for trial. The former guard will go on trial on Feb. 11, a court spokeswoman said.

In the northeastern town of Neubrandenburg, a 95-year-old former paramedic at Auschwitz will go on trial on Feb. 29 after a court deemed him fit for trial in December. Hubert Z. is accused of being an accessory to the murder of 3,681 people.

(Reporting by Michael Nienaber,; Editing by Dominic Evans)

Join the conversation about this story »

The crazy story of the man who fought for Finland, the Nazis, and the US Army Special Forces

$
0
0

thorni we are the mighty

Larry Thorne enlisted in the US Army as a private in 1954, but he was already a war hero. That's because his real name was Lauri Törni, and he had been fighting the Soviets for much of his adult life.

Born in Finland in 1919, Törni enlisted at age 19 in his country's army and fought against the Soviet Union in the Winter War of 1939-1940, according to the newspaper Helsingin Sanomat.

Lauri_Törni._June_27_1944He quickly rose to the rank of captain and took command of a group of ski troops, who quite literally skied into battle against enemy forces.

In 1942 he was severely wounded after he skied into a mine, but that didn't slow him down. In 1944, during what the Finns called The Continuation War, he received Finland's version of the Medal of Honor — the Mannerheim Cross — for his bravery while leading a light infantry battalion.

Unfortunately for Törni, Finland eventually fell to the communists in 1944.

But instead of surrendering, he joined up with the German SS so he could continue to fight the Soviets.

He received additional training in Nazi Germany and then looked forward to returning to the battlefield.

Torni_lauriBut then Germany fell, too, and the Finn-turned-Waffen SS officer was arrested by the British, according to War History Online.

Not that being put into a prison camp would stop him either.

"In the last stages of the war he surrendered to the British and eventually returned to Finland after escaping a British POW camp," the account at War History Online reads.

"When he returned, he was then arrested by the Finns, even though he had received their Medal of Honor, and was sentenced to six years in prison for treason."

He ended up serving only half his sentence before he was pardoned by the president of Finland in 1948.

Törni's path to the US Army was paved by crucial legislation from Congress along with the creation of a new military unit: Special Forces.

June 1950 saw the passing of the Lodge-Philbin Act, which allowed foreigners to join the US military and allowed them citizenship if they served honorably for at least five years.

Just two years later, the Army would stand up its new Special Forces unit at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

More than 200 Eastern Europeans joined Army Special Forces before the Act expired in 1959, according to historian Max Boot.

Among those was Törni, who enlisted in 1954 under the name Larry Thorne.

"The Soviets wanted to get their hands on Thorne and forced the Finnish government to arrest him as a wartime German collaborator," the account at ArlingtonCemetery.net reads.

"They planned to take him to Moscow to be tried for war crimes. Thorne had other plans. He escaped, made his way to the United States, and with the help of Wild Bill Donovan became a citizen. The wartime head of the OSS knew of Thorne's commando exploits."

A Special Forces legend

Lauri Torni 2

Thorne quickly distinguished himself among his peers of Green Berets. Though he enlisted as a private, his wartime skill set led him to become an instructor at the Special Warfare School at Fort Bragg, teaching everything from survival to guerrilla tactics.

In 1957 he was commissioned a second lieutenant, and he would rise to the rank of captain just as war was on the horizon in Vietnam.

But first he would take part in a daring rescue mission inside Iran. In 1962, then-Captain Thorne led an important mission to recover classified materials from a US Air Force plane that crashed on a mountaintop on the Iran-Turkish-Soviet border, according to Helsingin Sanomat. Though three earlier attempts to secure the materials had failed, Thorne's team was successful.

According to the US Army:

Thorne quickly made it into the U.S. Special Forces and in 1962, as a Captain, he led his detachment onto the highest mountain in Iran to recover the bodies and classified material from an American C-130 airplane that had crashed. It was a mission in which others had failed, but Thorne's unrelenting spirit led to its accomplishment.

This mission initially formed his status as a U.S. Special Forces legend, but it was his deep strategic reconnaissance and interdiction exploits with Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Studies and Observation Group, also known as MACV-SOG, that solidified his legendary status.

In Vietnam, he earned the Bronze Star medal for heroism, along with five Purple Hearts for combat wounds, War History Online writes. According to Helsingin Sanomat, his wounds allowed him to return to the rear away from combat, but he refused and instead requested command of a special-operations base instead.

On October 18, 1965, Thorne led the first MACV-SOG cross-border mission into Laos to interdict North Vietnamese movement down the Ho Chi Minh trail. Using South Vietnamese air force helicopters, his team was successfully inserted into a clearing inside Laos while Thorne remained in a chase helicopter to direct support as needed. Once the team gave word it had made it in, he responded that he was heading back to base.

Roughly five minutes later, while flying in poor visibility and bad weather, the helicopter crashed. The Army first listed Thorne as missing in action, then later declared he was killed in action — in South Vietnam. The wreckage of the aircraft was found before the end of the war, and the remains of the South Vietnamese aircrew were recovered, but Thorne's body was never found.

Thorne's exploits in combat made him seem invincible among his Special Forces brothers, and with his body never recovered, many believed he had survived the crash and continued to live in hiding or had been taken prisoner by the North Vietnamese, according to POW Network.

"Many believed he was exactly the sort of near-indestructible soldier who would have simply walked back out of the jungle, and they found it hard to believe he had been killed," Helsingin Sanomat writes.

The mystery was finally put to rest in 1999. The remains of the legendary Special Forces soldier were recovered from the crash site. DNA confirmed the identities of the aircrew, while dental records proved Törni had died on that fateful night in 1965, Helsingin Sanomat reported.

"He was a complex yet driven man who valorously fought oppression under three flags and didn't acknowledge the meaning of quit," US Army Special Forces Col. Sean Swindell said during a ceremony in 2010.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Someone figured out the purpose of the extra shoelace hole on your running shoes — and it will blow your mind

It 'feels like justice': 94-year-old former Auschwitz guard goes on trial in Germany

$
0
0

aushciwtz guard trial former

A 94-year-old former guard at Auschwitz lowered his eyes as he arrived at a German court on Thursday to be tried as an accessory to the murder of at least 170,000 people in what is likely to be one of the last Nazi war crimes trials.

Reinhold Hanning was 20 years old in 1942 when he started serving as a Waffen SS guard at the death camp in occupied Poland, where more than 1.1 million Jews were killed by the Nazis.

There was a heavy police presence around the court in the western town of Detmold as Hanning walked in, wearing glasses and a dark brown tweed jacket and looking at the ground, for a session limited to just two hours because of his age.

Prosecutors said Hanning had joined the Waffen SS, the armed wing of the Nazi party, voluntarily at the age of 18 and fought in Eastern Europe during the early stages of World War II before being transferred to Auschwitz in January 1942.

Accused by the prosecutor's office in Dortmund as well as by 38 joint plaintiffs from Hungary, Israel, Canada, Britain, the United States, and Germany, Hanning will hear the testimony of former camp inmates in court.

One of them is Erna de Vries, who was deported to Auschwitz along with her mother in 1943, at the age of 23. Considered a "Jewish crossbreed" as her father was Protestant, she was saved from the gas chamber and transferred to a labor camp.

"I survived, but to this day I don't know exactly how my mother was killed," she told Reuters ahead of the trial. "The last thing she said to me was, 'You will survive and explain what happened to us.'

"I am not hateful but it somehow feels like justice to see this man, who was working there when my mother died, on trial."

Demjanjuk precedent

auschwitz guard trial

Germany's Nazi war crimes office in Ludwigsburg has found that Hanning served as a guard at Auschwitz until at least June 1944.

He has admitted to having been a guard, in a statement to the prosecution, but has denied involvement in the mass killings, part of the Nazis' Final Solution for the extermination of Europe's Jews.

Investigators say he also served at Auschwitz's Birkenau subdivision, where about 90% of more than 1.2 million killings in the camp were carried out in four gas chambers.

Prosecutors maintain that the Nazis' machinery of murder hinged on people like Hanning guarding the prisoners, and they accuse him of expediting, or at least facilitating, the slaughter.

A precedent for such an approach was set in 2011 when death camp guard Ivan Demjanjuk was convicted of being an accessory to mass murder.

former auschwitz guard

Last year, 94-year-old Oskar Groening, known as the "bookkeeper of Auschwitz," was sentenced to four years in prison for being an accessory to the murder of 300,000 people in Auschwitz.

Three other former death camp workers in their 90s — two men and a woman — are due to go on trial in the next few months.

Because of their age, their hearings, like Hanning's, will be restricted to two hours a day, assuming they are fit to face trial.

But Nazi hunter Efraim Zuroff, responsible for war crime investigations at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said from his office in Jerusalem that age should not be an obstacle to prosecution.

"When you think of these cases, don't think of frail, old, sick men and women," he said, "but of young people who devoted their energies to a system that implemented the Final Solution and aimed to obliterate the Jewish people. 

(Reporting by Bernd Thissen; Writing by Tina Bellon; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Join the conversation about this story »

Hitler's secret Nazi war machines of World War II

$
0
0

hitler and himmler

Nearly 83 years ago this month, Hitler secretly began rearming the Nazis in violation of the Treaty of Versailles.

In 1934, Hitler told Nazi military leaders that 1942 was the target year for going to war in the east.

Hitler's engineers secretly developed ambitious projects and rapidly produced sophisticated technology that was decades ahead of its time.

In the 2015 fall issue of Weapons of WWII magazine, author KM Lee detailed some of Hitler's advanced weaponry.

Here's a look at are some of the secret weapons the Nazis created during World War II:

SEE ALSO: Hitler created the largest gun ever, and it was a disaster

Hitler's stealth "flying wing" bomber

Referred to as "Hitler's secret weapon," the Horten Ho 229 bomber was designed to carry 2,000 pounds of armaments while flying at 49,000 feet at speeds north of 600 mph.

Equipped with twin turbojet engines, two cannons, and R4M rockets, the Horten Ho 229 was the world's first stealth aircraft, making its first flight in 1944.

Source: Weapons of WWII magazine

 



According to the Smithsonian, Luftwaffe chief Hermann Göring allocated half a million reichsmarks to brothers Reimar and Walter Horten to manufacture the aircraft.

Plagued with problems, the Horten didn't last long in combat. But the bomber's engineering did inspire today's stealth aircraft — like the Northrop Grumman B-2 bomber.

Source: Weapons of WWII magazine



The Fritz X radio-guided bomb

Considered the grandfather of smart bombs, the Fritz X was a 3,450-pound explosive equipped with a radio receiver and sophisticated tail controls that helped guide the bomb to its target.

According to the US Air Force, the Fritz X could penetrate 28 inches of armor and could be deployed from 20,000 feet,an altitude out of reach of antiaircraft equipment at the time.

Less than a month after the bomb was developed, the Nazis sank the Italian battleship Roma off Sardinia in September 1943. The Fritz X's combat use was limited, however, because only a few German aircraft were designed to carry the bomb.

Source: Weapons of WWII magazine



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Donald Trump's ex-wife once said Trump kept a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed

$
0
0

trump

According to a 1990 Vanity Fair interview, Ivana Trump once told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that her husband, real-estate mogul Donald Trump, now a leading Republican presidential candidate, kept a book of Hitler's speeches near his bed.

"Last April, perhaps in a surge of Czech nationalism, Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler's collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed ... Hitler's speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist," Marie Brenner wrote.

Hitler was one of history's most prolific orators, building a genocidal Nazi regime with speeches that bewitched audiences.

"He learned how to become a charismatic speaker, and people, for whatever reason, became enamored with him," Professor Bruce Loebs, who has taught a class called the Rhetoric of Hitler and Churchill for the past 46 years at Idaho State University, told Business Insider earlier this year.

"People were most willing to follow him, because he seemed to have the right answers in a time of enormous economic upheaval."

My new order hitlerWhen Brenner asked Trump about how he came to possess Hitler's speeches, "Trump hesitated" and then said, "Who told you that?"

"I don't remember," Brenner reportedly replied.

Trump then recalled, "Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of 'Mein Kampf,' and he's a Jew."

Brenner added that Davis did acknowledge that he gave Trump a book about Hitler.

"But it was 'My New Order,' Hitler's speeches, not 'Mein Kampf,'" Davis reportedly said. "I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I'm not Jewish."

After Trump and Brenner changed topics, Trump returned to the subject and reportedly said, "If, I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them."

In the Vanity Fair article, Ivana Trump told a friend that her husband's cousin, John Walter "clicks his heels and says, 'Heil Hitler," when visiting Trump's office.

Here's the entire Vanity Fair interview.

SEE ALSO: Trump campaign blames 'young intern' for tweet with apparent Nazi imagery

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How much Donald Trump makes in speaking fees compared to everyone else

Amazing insight into what US intelligence knew about Hitler in 1943

$
0
0

Adolf Hitler Nazis

One of history's most brutal tyrants was a diagnosed schizophrenic on a mission to avenge his childhood years of repressed rage, according to Henry Murray, an American psychologist and a Harvard professor.

In 1943, the US Office of Strategic Services, a precursor to the CIA, commissioned Murray to study Adolf Hitler's personality to try to predict his behavior. In his 229-page report, "Analysis of the Personality of Adolf Hitler," Murray described Hitler as a paranoid "utter wreck" who was "incapable of normal human relationships."

"It is forever impossible to hope for any mercy or humane treatment from him," Murray wrote.

SEE ALSO: 22 brutal dictators you've never heard of

After a frustrating childhood, Hitler felt obligated to exert dominance in all things.

Hitler suffered from intolerable feelings of inferiority, largely stemming from his small, frail, and sickly physical appearance during his childhood.

He refused to go to school because he was ashamed that he was a poor student compared to his classmates. His mother appeased him by allowing him to drop out.

"He never did any manual work, never engaged in athletics, and was turned down as forever unfit for conscription in the Austrian Army," Murray writes.

Hitler managed his insecurities by worshiping "brute strength, physical force, ruthless domination, and military conquest."

Even sexually, Hitler was described as a "full-fledged masochist," who humiliated and abused his partners.



Much of his wrath originated from a severe Oedipus complex.

As a child, Hitler experienced the Oedipus complex — love of mother and hate of father — which he developed after accidentally seeing his parents having sex, Murray's report says.

Hitler was subservient and respectful to his father but viewed him as an enemy who ruled the family "with tyrannical severity and injustice." According to the report, Hitler was envious of his father's masculine power and dreamed of humiliating him to re-establish "the lost glory of his mother."

For 16 years, Hitler did not exhibit any form of ambition or competition because his father had died and he had not yet discovered a new enemy.



Hitler frequently felt emasculated.

Another blow to Hitler's masculinity: He was "incapable of consummating in a normal fashion," old sexual partners shared with Murray.

"This infirmity we must recognize as an instigation to exorbitant cravings for superiority. Unable to demonstrate male power before a woman, he is impelled to compensate by exhibiting unsurpassed power before men in the world at large," he writes.

As mentioned, when Hitler did have sexual relations with a woman, he exhibited masochistic behaviors. Hitler was said to have multiple partners, but eventually married his long-term mistress, Eva Braun, hours before the two committed suicide together in his Berlin bunker.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Hitler created the largest gun ever, and it was a total disaster

$
0
0

hitler gustav railway gun

Eager to invade France, Nazi leader Adolf Hitler demanded a new weapon that could easily pierce the concrete fortifications of the French Maginot Line— the only major physical barrier standing between him and the rest of Western Europe.

In 1941, the year after France fell, German steelmaker and arms manufacturer Friedrich Krupp A.G. company began constructing Hitler's Gustav gun, according to "Top Secret Weapons" documentary.

The four-story, 155-foot-long gun, which weighs 1,350 tons, shot 10,000-pound shells from its mammoth 98-foot bore.

Here's what the gun looked like when fired:

gustav gun GIFThe massive weapon was presented to the Nazis free of charge to show Krupp's contribution to the German war effort, according to historian C. Peter Chen.

In spring 1942, the Gustav gun made its debut at the siege of Sevastopol. The 31-inch gun barrel fired 300 shells on the Crimean city.

german nazi gun

As the Nazis would soon find out, however, the ostentatious gun had some serious disadvantages:

  • Its size made it an easy target for Allied bombers flying overhead
  • Its weight meant it could be transported only via a costly specialized railway (which the Nazis had to build in advance)
  • It required a crew of 2,000 to operate
  • The five-part gun took four days to assemble in the field and hours to calibrate for a single shot
  • It could fire only 14 rounds a day

Within a year, the Nazis discontinued the Gustav gun, and Chen notes that Allied forces eventually scrapped the massive weapon.

SEE ALSO: Amazing insight into what US intelligence knew about Hitler in 1943

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Trump's latest rally featured fights, Nazi salutes, and a call to light protesters on fire

The remarkable story of a woman who was born at Auschwitz

$
0
0

auschwitz

It was at the age of seven, when asked at school to write down her name and place of birth, that Angela Orosz was first made aware she had been born in Auschwitz.

“I really had a hard time with that word,” she said. “I was begging my mother, ‘can we change it?’ She said ‘no, I’m not going to change it, this is what you have to know’.”

Orosz said she had no idea then what Auschwitz, the Nazi extermination camp, actually meant. “It wasn’t that I struggled with having been born there. That only struck me later,” she explained. “It was just because it was so awfully difficult to spell.”

It would take her more than a further half century before she felt able to recount the story of her and her mother, who died in 1992. At the age of 60 she finally broke her silence to tell a local journalist at her home in Montreal how her mother, Vera Bein, had given birth on the top bunk in the barracks of camp C at Auschwitz-Birkenau in December 1944.

She had weighed just 1kg and was too weak to cry. “That’s what saved me,” she said.

But it was in a German courtroom just over a week ago that the now 71-year-old made one of her most courageous decisions yet, to take to the witness stand in the case of Reinhold Hanning, a 94-year-old former SS guard, in what will be one of the last from the Nazi concentration camps. She wanted to give testimony, she said, “on behalf of the six million Jews who cannot be here because they were murdered”.

orosz richt“In fact, it was far more than six million that were murdered,” she told the Guardian in Dresden this week. “Just think of all those children that didn’t grow up and have children, not to mention the many women who survived Auschwitz but were never able to have children.

“And, as we know now, their children who in turn suffer from hormonal imbalances as a result of the chemicals their mothers were given. I’m not a mathematician but you don’t need to be to know that six million is actually a very misleading number.”

Orosz clamped a concentrated gaze on Hanning as she recounted her life story in the Detmold courtroom on 26 February, telling him how her parents had arrived in Auschwitz on 25 May 1944, when her mother was three months pregnant. 

Angela Orosz’s parents

“My mother had already been separated from my father and would never see him again,” she told the court. “When it was her turn in front of Mengele [the murderous Auschwitz doctor who notoriously experimented on inmates], my mother told him that she was pregnant, hoping he would be compassionate ... Mengele snapped “Du dumme gans” [you stupid goose] and ordered her to the right.”

That meant she had been chosen for forced labour, rather than the gas chamber.

Orosz’s voice is a vital one in the case, in which prosecutors have gathered a handful of survivors of the mass deportation of 425,000 members of Hungary’s Jewish community to Auschwitz between May and July 1944, 90% of whom were exterminated.

The trial is based on the fact that Hanning worked as a guard there during that period. By his very presence there, according to prosecutors, he was a cog in the killing machine and is accused of being an accessory to the murder of 170,000 people, the number killed between 17 May and 12 June, the period it is known he was there.

Orosz said her hopes rest on Hanning finally deciding to speak out. So far he has pledged to stay silent. “As I said to him in court: ‘You know what happened to all the people. You enabled their murder. Tell us! Tell us!’”

To the many critics who have said it is inhumane to put a frail 94-year-old in the dock, Orosz has strong words: “So what if it’s a death sentence for him?

“With 94, you have no life expectancy anyway. If he can sit, hear and see, if he can eat, he can also appear in a court. He was part of the killing machine. And what about my father who was murdered at the age of 32, while someone like him was able to live happily ever after. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how many years in prison he might get. He’s not going to be going to jail anyway.

“What matters is whatever he might say about what happened in Auschwitz, what he did in Auschwitz, what he saw in Auschwitz, will enter the history books, so that even if some people might say ‘the Jews are lying’, they will hear from the mouth of the Nazi what happened.”

Orosz’s true understanding of her origins crept up on her slowly throughout her childhood in Hungary. “I remember Saturday nights at home and all the Holocaust survivors came. I would sit under the table listening to what they were talking about and it was always ‘the lager [camp] this’, ‘the lager that’ and people brought artefacts with them from Auschwitz, a cooking pot, a blanket. Slowly, slowly I built the story up.”

Angela Orosz, pictured with her mother.

At the age of 11 she was told the full story, of how her mother had been forced into hard labour. When she was seven months pregnant, Bein was selected for experimentation by Mengele’s team, who injected a burning substance into her cervix. “Right behind in her uterus was the foetus, me,” said Orosz. “These injections were terrible, painful. Injection one, the foetus moved to the left side ... the next day, another injection, and the foetus moved in the other direction.”

But then, somehow, the doctors forgot about her mother. Her pregnancy did not show because Orosz was so tiny. “If not for this we would both have been killed before I had taken my first breath,” she said.

Later, her mother told her of another woman who had given birth. Mengele had bound her breasts, waiting to see how long the baby would live without being fed. “Shortly after, both of them were murdered.”

A sympathetic Hungarian doctor offered to perform an abortion on Bein, insisting it could save her life. She declined.

When she went into labour, she was helped by the barrack orderly who managed to get a sheet, hot water and scissors. “She told my mother to go to the top bunk. In the barrack, the bunks were three on top of each other. She went up after my mother and helped her give birth.

“I was born three days before the SS celebrated Christmas, so probably on 21 December 1944. I was so malnourished, I was unable to cry which helped ensure no one discovered me.”

Three hours after the birth, Bein had to leave her baby on the bunk and go out into the freezing cold for roll call, wearing just rags and wooden clogs, “the whole time praying I would still be alive when she returned,” Orosz said.

Five weeks after her birth, Auschwitz was liberated. On that day, 27 January, another child was born, Gyorgy Faludi. “His mother was so weak she didn’t have enough milk, so my mother fed us both.” Sandor Polgar, a fellow survivor from Bein’s hometown, discovered her and the baby and insisted on going to the town of Auschwitz – the Nazi-occupied Polish town of Oświęcim – to get a birth certificate.

“I suspect having lost his own wife and daughter in Auschwitz he was desperate to ensure I was acknowledged.”

Polgar became Orosz’s stepfather when he and her mother subsequently married.

When she was one year old Orosz weighed just 3kg (6.6lb), “the weight most babies have at birth,” she said. “Most doctors refused to treat me, believing I would die. Even my grandmother said to her daughter: ‘Let her die, Verushka (her nickname for her), she will never be a proper child.’ But one doctor held me upside down like a chicken and when I raised my head, he said: ‘This child will live’.”

Her bones were so weak she could not walk until she was seven. “All my socks were thick knitted things to cover up my stick legs. All my dresses were full of lace and gathered together to make me look fatter.”

Orosz as a child

In Dresden this week to attend a psychiatrists’ conference, she will talk from her own experience about how mothers pass trauma on to their children.

“I got the invitation to speak in August and I thought this isn’t really relevant to me. I’m normal. But then I called my kids and my 47-year-old daughter gave me a list from here to China about why I was a typical Holocaust survivor. She said how I sent her shopping on her own at the age of three, because I wanted her to be independent, in case the Holocaust happened again. And she said I constantly told her and her brother: ‘Your generation would never survive the Holocaust because you’re spoilt rotten.’ Then when she told me how afraid she was of giving birth, I hit the roof and told her: ‘You’re afraid? You have a home and husband and nurses, you are out of your mind to be afraid!’”

“Mother, your whole life is the Holocaust!” her daughter told her. “I hadn’t realised until then,” she admitted.

Her children have been supportive of her trip to Germany. “They teased me and said: ‘Your whole life you’ve never seen a psychiatrist, now you’re talking to 225 at once!’”

Elegantly dressed in a black lace dress and a twisted string of pearls, she speaks in a heavy singsong Hungarian accent, despite more than 40 years spent in Canada.

For years Orosz had refused to give evidence in a courtroom, fearful of the nervous stomach pains it brought on when she talked about her and her mother’s experiences.

Related: Auschwitz survivor angers co-plaintiffs in SS officer trial by saying prosecutions should stop

But then she saw media coverage of the trial of Oskar Gröning last year, and heard how a fellow survivor, Eva Kor, had stood up and hugged the 94-year-old former Auschwitz bookkeeper in an act of forgiveness. “I just couldn’t take it. I sent an email to my lawyer, Heinrich-Peter Rothmann, to tell him ‘I’m coming to Germany immediately’. I mean, how can you forgive these people? It’s certainly not in me.”

She and Kor, once friends, are no longer talking.

When she visited Auschwitz for the first time last January for the 70th anniversary of its liberation, Orosz tried to trace the barracks where she was born. But it was pitch black and the area was sealed off because of the commemoration ceremony.

“I will return because I have a passionate wish to see where my mother was, to touch where I was born, to try to feel what she might have felt. I am still haunted by that idea that while normally when you give birth you go home to a warm place with your partner by your side, petrified because of the responsibility, my mother had no future, no food, nothing.

“But still she believed I would live. She said to me I looked like a little bird without feathers and that I was really ugly – though not to her.”

This article was written by Kate Connolly in Dresden from The Guardian and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Researchers say the Nazi gold train — supposedly discovered by amateur treasure hunters — doesn’t exist

The world’s oldest living man is an Auschwitz survivor

$
0
0

yisrael kristal

The world’s oldest documented living man has been confirmed as an Israeli Auschwitz survivor living in Haifa.

Israel Kristal, aged 112 and 178 days on 11 March, was handed a certificate at his home by a representative of the Guinness World Records confirming him as the oldest known man on the planet.

Kristal succeeded 112-year-old Yasutaro Koide of Japan, who died earlier this month. Asked about his longevity Kristal said: “I don’t know the secret for long life. I believe that everything is determined from above and we shall never know the reasons why.

“There have been smarter, stronger and better looking men than me who are no longer alive. All that is left for us to do is to keep on working as hard as we can and rebuild what is lost.”

Kristal was born in Zarnow, Poland, on 15 September 1903. When the first world war broke out in 1914, he saw Kaiser Franz Joseph in person but became separated from his parents, later moving aged 17 to Lodz to work in the family confectionery business.

He continued to work as a sweet maker in the ghetto there when it was established by the Nazis in 1940. Four years later he was sent to Auschwitz, where he lost his wife.

Kristal himself survived despite being used as a slave labourer in Auschwitz and other concentration camps.

He was rescued from the brink of death by the Allies in May 1945, weighing only 37 kilos. A sole survivor of his family – his children also died during the Holocaust – he emigrated in 1950 to the city of Haifa in Israel with his second wife and their son.

Despite his great age, Kristal is not the oldest documented person on the planet, a record claimed by 115-year-old Susannah Mushatt Jones of Brooklyn, New York.

Individuals over 110 are tracked by the Gerontology Research Group which provides Guinness World Records with data on documented individuals of that age and older.

Marco Frigatti of Guinness said of Kristal: “This record category continues to be one of particular human interest and we have been able to verify that he is the new oldest living man.”

There was initially some question whether Kristal would qualify, with rules requiring an official document demonstrating a person’s age which needs to have been issued in the first 20 years of life. In Kristal’s case he had a marriage certificate issued when he was 25.

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

This article was written by Peter Beaumont in Jerusalem from The Guardian and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

SEE ALSO: The remarkable story of a woman who was born at Auschwitz

Join the conversation about this story »

The tragically powerful story behind the lone German who refused to give Hitler the Nazi salute

$
0
0

not a nazi bless it

Adopted by the Nazi Party in the 1930s, Hitler's infamous "sieg heil" (meaning "hail victory") salute was mandatory for all German citizens as a demonstration of loyalty to the Führer, his party, and his nation.

August Landmesser, the lone German refusing to raise a stiff right arm amid Hitler's presence at a 1936 rally, had been a loyal Nazi.

Landmesser joined the Nazi Party in 1931 and began to work his way up the ranks of what would become the only legal political affiliation in the country.

irmaTwo years later, Landmesser fell madly in love with Irma Eckler, a Jewish woman, and proposed marriage to her in 1935.

After his engagement to a Jewish woman was discovered, Landmesser was expelled from the Nazi Party.

Landmesser and Eckler decided to file a marriage application in Hamburg, but the union was denied under the newly enacted Nuremberg Laws.

The couple welcomed their first daughter, Ingrid, in October 1935.

And then on June 13, 1936, Landmesser gave a crossed-arm stance during Hitler's christening of a new German navy vessel.

The act of defiance stands out amid the throng of Nazi salutes.

august landmesserIn 1937, fed up, Landmesser attempted to flee Nazi Germany to Denmark with his family. But he was detained at the border and charged with "dishonoring the race," or "racial infamy," under the Nuremberg Laws.

August LandmesserA year later, Landmesser was acquitted for a lack of evidence and was instructed to not have a relationship with Eckler.

Refusing to abandon his wife, Landmesser ignored Nazi wishes and was arrested again in 1938 and sentenced to nearly three years in a concentration camp.

He would never see the woman he loved or his child again.

The secret state police also arrested Eckler, who was several months pregnant with the couple's second daughter.

She gave birth to Irene in prison and was sent to an all-women's concentration camp soon after her delivery.

Eckler is believed to have been transferred to what the Nazi's called a "euthanasia center" in 1942, where she was murdered with 14,000 others.

After his prison sentence, Landmesser worked a few jobs before he was drafted into war in 1944.

A few months later, he was declared missing in action in Croatia. 

Here's a bit more on August Landmesser's story:

 

SEE ALSO: This is the last known photo of Hitler

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A mysterious lost Nazi train — supposedly filled with gold — may have been found

Germany's top Nazi hunter will keep up the chase for another decade

$
0
0

Jens Rommel

Undeterred by dwindling numbers of living suspects, Germany's top Nazi hunter is determined to keep tracking down criminals involved in Hitler's murder machine for another decade.

As a handful of new Auschwitz-related trials get underway, Jens Rommel says his work is getting more difficult every year and yields only modest results.

But it still matters.

"We help to make sure these crimes don't disappear into history and that they have a relevance today ... There is still a lot of work to do," said Rommel, no relation to Hitler's Field Marshal Erwin Rommel.

Aging suspects, most of whom deny guilt, are growing frail, making the race to prosecute them all the more pressing.

Germany's state justice ministers last year gave Rommel's Central Office for the Investigation of Nazi Crimes up to 10 more years to continue its investigative work, before it is turned into a documentation center.

The 2011 conviction of Sobibor death camp guard John Demjanjuk also gave it new legal territory to explore - it was the first time that involvement in a death camp was seen as sufficient grounds for culpability even without proof of a specific crime.

"Even with no hard proof of a specific deed, being a wheel in the machinery of a camp is now punishable," said Rommel.

"Never too late"

oskar groening

Demjanjuk's conviction 70 years after the crimes did not come too late for Dutch Jew David van Huiden whose parents and sister died in Sobibor's gas chambers.

"It's never too late because the crimes committed are so overwhelmingly heavy that even today nobody could understand how this could happen in a civilized society," said the 84-year-old who sat through some of the trial.

The case widened the net of possible suspects and triggered a wave of new investigations into guards, medics and other camp workers which has led to the current trials.

The same legal argument was used to convict Oskar Groening, the "bookkeeper of Auschwitz" last year and to charge camp guard Reinhold Hanning, on trial in Detmold.

Auschwitz guard Ernst Tremmel is to go on trial near Frankfurt in April while a case against Auschwitz medic, Hubert Zafke, this month stalled due to his frail health. Both are over 90.

Rommel, who took over the Office in October, is also sifting through former Soviet records and chasing leads in Argentina where many Nazis fled.

The intense activity at the organization's base in the western town of Ludwigsburg coincides with a new zeal among young Germans to ask about their grandparents' role in the Nazi era.

Past failures

former nazi

Many victims and perpetrators blocked out the traumatic experiences after the war to build new lives.

Now, few Germans openly oppose putting suspects on trial although some argue pictures of frail men in their 90s shuffling into courtrooms are grotesque.

Some criticize Germany for letting many high-ranking Nazis and SS members escape justice only for their juniors to be convicted now.

An international military tribunal put some top Nazi leaders, including Hermann Goering and Rudolf Hess, on trial soon after World War Two in the Nuremburg Trials.

But in the 1950s and 60s, a West German judiciary comprising many former Nazis had little appetite to pursue Hitler's henchmen at a time when many Germans argued they had been held hostage by 'Der Fuehrer'.

old naziBetween 1945 and 2005 West German courts convicted 6,656 Nazi criminals out of more than 36,000 investigations into more than 170,000 suspects, a study by historian Andreas Eichmueller showed in 2008.

The numbers, which also include prosecutions in the former Communist East since 1989, have only increased by one or two since then, he said.

"From today's point of view and in terms of victims' need for justice, there has certainly been (a failure of justice)," said Eichmueller, of Munich's Nazi documentation center.

But he also argued that given the scale of support for the Naziregime among Germans, it would have been unimaginable to put tens of thousands of people on trial.

Rommel acknowledges the past failures but is pragmatic. "It is unsatisfactory that so many were not pursued, but today I have to pursue those who I can." 

(Reporting by Madeline Chambers; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: IAN BREMMER: Greece is headed for a humanitarian disaster


How the Associated Press cooperated with the Nazis

$
0
0

Lebensborn nazi

The Associated Press news agency entered a formal cooperation with the Hitler regime in the 1930s, supplying American newspapers with material directly produced and selected by the Nazi propaganda ministry, archive material unearthed by a German historian has revealed.

When the Nazi party seized power in Germany in 1933, one of its first objectives was to bring into line not just the national press, but international media too. The Guardian was banned within a year, and by 1935 even bigger British-American agencies such as Keystone and Wide World Photos were forced to close their bureaus after coming under attack for employing Jewish journalists.

Associated Press, which has described itself as the “marine corps of journalism” (“always the first in and the last out”) was the only western news agency able to stay open in Hitler’s Germany, continuing to operate until the US entered the war in 1941. It thus found itself in the presumably profitable situation of being the prime channel for news reports and pictures out of the totalitarian state.

In an article published in academic journal Studies in Contemporary History , historian Harriet Scharnberg shows that AP was only able retain its access by entering into a mutually beneficial two-way cooperation with the Nazi regime.

The New York-based agency ceded control of its output by signing up to the so-called Schriftleitergesetz (editor’s law), promising not to publish any material “calculated to weaken the strength of the Reich abroad or at home”.

This law required AP to hire reporters who also worked for the Nazi party’s propaganda division. One of the four photographers employed by the Associated Press in the 1930s, Franz Roth, was a member of the SS paramilitary unit’s propaganda division, whose photographs were personally chosen by Hitler. AP has removed Roth’s pictures from its website since Scharnberg published her findings, though thumbnails remain viewable due to “software issues.”

nazi AP

AP also allowed the Nazi regime to use its photo archives for its virulently antisemitic propaganda literature. Publications illustrated with AP photographs include the bestselling SS brochure “Der Untermensch” (“The Sub-Human”) and the booklet “The Jews in the USA”, which aimed to demonstrate the decadence of Jewish Americans with a picture of New York mayor Fiorello LaGuardia eating from a buffet with his hands.

Coming just before Associated Press’s 170th anniversary in May, the newly discovered information raises not just difficult questions about the role AP played in allowing Nazi Germany to conceal its true face during Hitler’s first years in power, but also about the agency’s relationship with contemporary totalitarian regimes.

While the AP deal enabled the west to peek into a repressive society that may otherwise have been entirely hidden from view – for which Berlin correspondent Louis P Lochner won a Pulitzer in 1939 – the arrangement also enabled the Nazis to cover up some of its crimes. Scharnberg, a historian at Halle’s Martin Luther University, argued that AP’s cooperation with the Hitler regime allowed the Nazis to “portray a war of extermination as a conventional war”.

In June 1941, Nazi troops invaded the town of Lviv in western Ukraine. Upon discovering evidence of mass killings carried out by Soviet troops, German occupying forces had organised “revenge” pogroms against the city’s Jewish population.

Franz Roth’s photographs of the dead bodies inside Lviv prisons were selected upon Hitler’s personal orders and distributed to the American press via AP.

“Instead of printing pictures of the days-long Lviv pogroms with its thousands of Jewish victims, the American press was only supplied with photographs showing the victims of the Soviet police and ‘brute’ Red Army war criminals,” Scharnberg told the Guardian.

“To that extent it is fair to say that these pictures played their part in disguising the true character of the war led by the Germans,” said the historian. “Which events were made visible and which remained invisible in AP’s supply of pictures followed German interests and the German narrative of the war.”

Nazi AP

Approached with these allegations, AP said in a statement that Scharnberg’s report “describes both individuals and their activities before and during the war that were unknown to AP”, and that it is currently reviewing documents in and beyond its archives to “further our understanding of the period”.

An AP spokesperson told the Guardian: “As we continue to research this matter, AP rejects any notion that it deliberately ‘collaborated’ with the Nazi regime. An accurate characterisation is that the AP and other foreign news organisations were subjected to intense pressure from the Nazi regime from the year of Hitler’s coming to power in 1932 until the AP’s expulsion from Germany in 1941. AP management resisted the pressure while working to gather accurate, vital and objective news in a dark and dangerous time.”

The new findings may only have been of interest to company historians, were it not for the fact that AP’s relationship with totalitarian regimes has once again come under scrutiny. Since January 2012, when AP became the first western news agency to open a bureau in North Korea, questions have repeatedly been raised about the neutrality of its Pyongyang bureau’s output.

In 2014, Washington-based website NK News alleged that top executives at AP had in 2011 “agreed to distribute state-produced North Korean propaganda through the AP name” in order to gain access to the highly profitable market of distributing picture material out of the totalitarian state. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea comes second from bottom in the current World Press Freedom Index.

A leaked draft agreement showed that AP was apparently willing to let the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) handpick one text and one photo journalist from its agitation and propaganda unit to work in its bureau. AP told the Guardian that “it would be presumptuous to assume ‘the draft’ has any significance”, but declined to disclose further information on the final agreement.

Significant events, reported in the international media, were not covered by AP’s Pyongyang bureau, such as the six-week public disappearance of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in September and October 2014, the November 2014 Sony Entertainment hack that had allegedly been orchestrated by a North Korean cyberwarfare agency, or a reports of a famine in South Hwanghae province in 2012.

When the French news agency Agence France-Presse signed an agreement to open a bureau in Pyongyang in January this year, AP’s former Pyongyang bureau chief Jean Lee commented that it was a sign of the regime’s “increased confidence in its ability to keep foreign journalists under control”.

The AP spokesperson denied that the agency submitted to censorship. “We do not run stories by the Korean Central News Agency or any government official before we publish them. At the same time, officials are free to grant or deny access or interviews.”

Nate Thayer, a former AP correspondent in Cambodia who published the leaked draft agreement, told the Guardian: “It looks like AP have learned very little from their own history. To claim, as the agency does, that North Korea does not control their output, is ludicrous. There is naturally an argument that any access to secretive states is important. But at the end of the day it matters whether you tell your readers that what you are reporting is based on independent and neutral sources”.

 

This article was written by Philip Oltermann in Berlin from The Guardian and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

SEE ALSO: Hitler's secret Nazi war machines of World War II

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Trump's latest rally featured fights, Nazi salutes, and a call to light protesters on fire

The year that prepared Adolf Hitler to be a brutal dictator

$
0
0

hitlerIn this excerpt from "1924: The Year That Made Hitler," author Peter Ross Range explains how November 9, 1923, was the date that launched one of the world's most brutal dictators.

"The national revolution has begun! The building is surrounded by six hundred heavily armed men! No one is allowed to leave."

Behind Hitler, a platoon of steel-helmeted men under the command of Captain Hermann Göring dragged a heavy machine gun into the beer hall entrance.

Thus began Adolf Hitler’s infamous beer hall coup d’état of 1923.

Called a putsch in German, the attempted overthrow had crumbled within seventeen hours.

Fifteen of Hitler’s men, four police troops, and one bystander had been killed.

Two days later, Hitler was caught and carried off to Landsberg Prison, thirty-eight miles west of Munich.

hitler putsch

He was imprisoned for the next thirteen months, from November 11, 1923, to December 20, 1924.

The failed putsch — an effort to unseat both the Bavarian and German governments — was a high-profile defeat for the budding Nazi leader and his small but radical movement.

Hitler’s  year in prison — virtually all of 1924 — was the price he paid for his premature lunge for power.

hitler in prisonHe not only had botched the biggest gamble a politician can make, but also had lost face: he was dismissed by some as an extremist clown who had led his followers into disaster and death.

Yet, by the time he was released from prison, Hitler had converted his plunge into disgrace and obscurity into a springboard for success.

The aborted coup d’état, it turned out, was the best thing that could have happened to him, and to his undisguised plans to become Germany’s dictator.

Had Hitler not spent 1924 in Landsberg Prison, he might never have emerged as the redefined and recharged politician who ultimately gained control of Germany, inflicted war on the world, and perpetrated the Holocaust.

The year that brought Hitler down — late 1923 through late 1924 — and that by rights should have ended his career, was in fact the hinge moment in Hitler’s transformation from impetuous revolutionary to patient political player with a long view of gaining power.

How did this transformation occur? How did Hitler make strategic use of his failure?

For one thing, the man knew a good publicity opportunity when he saw it; he brazenly turned his monthlong, widely watched trial for treason into a political soapbox, catapulting himself from Munich beer-hall rabble-rouser to nationally known political figure.

hitler Bundesarchiv

A prosecution for high treason that  could have put Hitler out of political circulation long enough for his movement and his charisma to disappear instead became what many jurists regarded as an embarrassment to the German justice system — and that historians see as a turnaround  moment in Hitler’s  climb to power.

Soon after recovering from his initial dark moments in Landsberg, Hitler turned his long months out of the political fray into a time of learning, self-reflection, and clarification of his views.

In prison, he had a captive audience of forty men, his fellow culprits in the unsuccessful putsch, and he often treated them to long lectures from his writings and busy mind.

But he needed to speak to the world. He was bursting with the urge to write, to capture his political philosophy for his followers, to cast into the permanence of print his beliefs and increasingly certain dogmas.

For long days and late into the night, he banged away on a small portable typewriter to produce what became the bible of Nazism, an autobiographical and political manifesto called Mein Kampf.

Published after his release from prison, the book soon became Hitler’s  ticket to intellectual respectability within his own movement. He called his time in prison “my university education at state expense.”

His year of “education” changed Hitler’s strategic vision, and it changed him. From a frustrated and depressed man stricken with self-doubt (suicide and death were repeated refrains during and after the putsch attempt), Hitler became, during his time behind bars, a man of overweening self-assurance and radically fixed beliefs on how to save Germany from its assorted ills.

hitler

He recast the fatal march he had led on November 9, 1923, into heroic martyrdom.

At a safe remove from everyday politics, Hitler cunningly allowed the Nazi Party to squabble and self-destruct so he could later call it back to life on his own terms, remade in his own image and decisively under his thumb. Reenergized and obsessively messianic,  the post-prison Hitler was ready for the march to high office.

The brutal ideologue Alfred Rosenberg, one of Hitler’s closest cronies at the time of the putsch who later became Hitler’s  state minister for the occupied eastern territories, said simply: “November ninth, 1923, gave birth to January thirtieth, 1933” — the day Hitler became chancellor of Germany.

Excerpted from 1924: The Year That Made Hitler by Peter Ross Range. Copyright © 2016 by Peter Ross Range. Reprinted with permission of Little, Brown and Company. All rights reserved.

SEE ALSO: Amazing insight into what US intelligence knew about Hitler in 1943

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A new book claims that the pope tried to kill Hitler

This is the last known photo of Hitler

$
0
0

hitler last photo

Shortly before committing suicide in his underground Führerbunker, Hitler stepped outside with an SS officer to survey nearby bomb damage from Allied forces.

On April 30, 1945, Hitler learned that Berlin had fallen into Allied control and that his Third Reich, after 12 years, would inevitably be destroyed.

Hitler then quickly married his long-time mistress, Eva Braun, and prepared his last will and political statement with his secretary, Traudl Junge, at about 4 p.m.

SEE ALSO: What it was like in the bunker Hitler died

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We went inside a secret basement under Grand Central that was one of the biggest World War II targets

Hitler's 3-mile-long abandoned Nazi resort is transforming into a luxury getaway

The 25 most ruthless leaders of all time

$
0
0

attila

One man's hero is another man's tyrant, a popular aphorism goes.

But while we can argue the validity and virtue of certain political agendas, the callous methods by which some leaders attain their goals are less up to interpretation.

After all, no matter how a historian tries to spin it, ordering a tower to be constructed out of live men stacked and cemented together with bricks and mortar is pretty brutal.

Business Insider put together a list of the most ruthless leaders of all time featuring men and women who employed merciless tactics to achieve their political and military agendas.

Note: All people on the list ruled prior to 1980, and no living figures were included. People are arranged in chronological order.

Qin Shi Huang

Reign: 247-210 B.C.

Qin, also called Qin Shihuangdi, united China in 221 B.C. and ruled as the first emperor of the Qin dynasty. He was known to order the killing of scholars whose ideas he disagreed with and the burning of "critical" books.

During his reign, he ordered the construction of a great wall (roughly speaking, the prequel to the modern Great Wall of China), and an enormous mausoleum featuring more than 6,000 life-size terra-cotta soldier figures. Large numbers of conscripts working on the wall died, and those working on the mausoleum were killed to preserve the secrecy of the tomb.

"Every time he captured people from another country, he castrated them in order to mark them and made them into slaves," Hong Kong University's Xun Zhou told the BBC.

Source: British Museum, Britannica, History, BBC



Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (aka Caligula)

Reign: A.D. 37-41

Caligula was quite popular at first because he freed citizens who were unjustly imprisoned and got rid of a stiff sales tax. But then he became ill, and he was never quite the same again.

He eliminated political rivals (forcing their parents to watch the execution), and declared himself a living god. According to Roman historian Suetonius, Caligula had sex with his sisters and sold their services to other men, raped and killed people, and made his horse a priest.

He was eventually attacked by a group of guardsman and stabbed 30 times.

Source: Biography.com, BBC, "Atlas of History's Greatest Heroes and Villains" by Howard Watson.



Attila the Hun

Reign: A.D. 434-453

After killing his brother, Attila became the leader of the Hunnic Empire, centered in present-day Hungary, and ended up becoming one of the most feared assailants of the Roman Empire.

He expanded the Hunnic Empire to present-day Germany, Russia, Ukraine, and the Balkans. He also invaded Gaul with the intention of conquering it, though he was defeated at the Battle of Catalaunian Plains.

"There, where I have passed, the grass will never grow gain," he reportedly remarked on his reign.

Source: Britannica, Biography



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
Viewing all 262 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>